On August 5, 2019, the Government of India made a historic move to abrogate Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which granted special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). This decision, hailed as a transformative step, reshaped the political and administrative landscape of the region. Here, we delve into the background, the steps involved, and the implications of this significant constitutional change.
What Was Article 370?
Article 370 was included in the Indian Constitution in 1949. It was a “temporary provision” which gave the state of Jammu and Kashmir special status. It was part of the agreement reached during J&K’s accession to India in 1947, which granted the state a special status. This meant:
- Jammu and Kashmir had its own Constitution.
- Indian laws would apply only in areas such as defense, foreign affairs, communications, and finance.
- The Indian Parliament could make laws for J&K only with the concurrence of the state’s legislature.
Moreover, Article 35A, introduced later, restricted non-residents from owning property or settling permanently in J&K, further isolating the state from the rest of India.
How Was Article 370 Abrogated?
The removal of Article 370 was achieved through a series of legal and parliamentary steps:
1. Presidential Order
The process began with a presidential order under Article 370(1)(d). This clause allowed the President of India to apply provisions of the Indian Constitution to J&K with the “concurrence of the state government.”
At the time, J&K was under President’s Rule, meaning the central government exercised the powers of the state government. This allowed the President of India to issue the order with the Union Cabinet’s approval.
2. Application of the Indian Constitution
The presidential order, known as C.O. 272, extended all provisions of the Indian Constitution to J&K. This nullified the state’s autonomy by bringing it under the purview of Indian laws like any other state.
3. Resolution in Parliament
A resolution recommending the abrogation of Article 370 was introduced in both houses of Parliament. The government cited the temporary nature of Article 370 and argued that its continuation hindered development and integration.
- The resolution passed with a majority in both houses:
- Rajya Sabha: August 5, 2019.
- Lok Sabha: August 6, 2019.
4. Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019
Simultaneously, the government introduced a bill to reorganize J&K. The act split the state into two union territories:
- Jammu & Kashmir: A union territory with a legislature.
- Ladakh: A union territory without a legislature.
The act was also passed by both houses of Parliament, marking the formal bifurcation of the state.
Legal Justifications and Challenges
The government justified the move on several grounds:
- Temporary Nature: Article 370 was intended to be a temporary provision, and its removal was long overdue.
- Economic Development: The special status was seen as a barrier to investment and progress in J&K.
- National Integration: The abrogation aimed to integrate J&K fully into India, ending its unique status.
Critics, however, raised concerns about the manner of its abrogation, citing:
- Lack of consultation with J&K’s residents.
- Alleged bypassing of constitutional norms.
Several petitions were filed in the Supreme Court challenging the move, and the matter remains under judicial review.
Immediate Impact
The government imposed certain restrictions to prevent unrest, including:
- Suspension of communication services.
- Deployment of additional security forces.
- Detention of political leaders.
Long-Term Implications
- Integration with India
The abrogation brought J&K under the same laws as the rest of India, facilitating uniform governance and legal frameworks. - Economic Prospects
By removing restrictions on land ownership and residency, the government aimed to attract investments, boost tourism, and create jobs in the region. - Security Concerns
The move was expected to curb separatism and militancy by addressing issues stemming from J&K’s isolation. - Political Repercussions
The decision polarized opinions, with supporters lauding it as a bold move and critics calling it undemocratic.
Conclusion
The abrogation of Article 370 marked a turning point in India’s constitutional and political history. While it promises integration, development, and security for the region, its success depends on how well the government addresses the aspirations and grievances of the people of J&K.
This bold step has not only redefined the region’s relationship with the rest of India but also set the stage for a new chapter in its development and governance.
Click here to read about the wars fought over Kashmir by India and Pakistan
1 thought on “The Abrogation of Article 370: When Kashmir was totally integrated with India”